Please scroll down for posts on main page...
|WARNING: THIS SITE FEATURES ORIGINAL THINKING...Jim Croce once sang Don't tug on Superman's cape..., which seems like reasonable advice should we not wish to anger the supreme powers. We do have this duality in our culture: the Superman that is the state collective, the leftist call to a politics of meaning managed by the state, the deification of "we're from the government and we'll take care of you" - versus the Superman that celebrates individual freedom, private property, freedom of conscience, free enterprise, and limited government. We humbly take on the latter's mantle and, eschewing the feeble tug, we dare to PULL, in hope of seeing freedom's rescue from the encroaching nanny state. We invite you, dear reader, to come and pull as well... Additionally, if you assume that means that we are unflinching, unquestioning GOP zombies, that would be incorrect. We reject statism in any form and call on individuals in our country to return to the original, classical liberalism of our founders. (We're also passionate about art, photography, cooking, technology, Judeo/Christian values, and satire as unique, individual pursuits of happiness to celebrate.)|
Superman's product of the century (so far):
I said I was going to become an activist. To me, there seems to be nothing more timely than this as we are at nexus on our entire economy.
A key question we must address is: Do we provide taxpayer funds to continue to do what has brought us to where we are in the first place? Or is there some other way to avert the crisis?
It appears that even the general public gets that the bailout proposal that has been under discussion - and voted down for that matter - has been a demand to continue the activities and behavior that have gotten us to where we are in the first place. Demanding more governmental power doesn't solve the crisis - it extends it.
And, in some grass roots efforts, it appears that the general public is getting that we must link stimulus with managing the crisis.
What we should all really face up to is that it is the back-breaking tax system that is just as much at fault in where we are economically - primarily because the tax code encourages a debtor society, secondarily because there is a severe lack of accountability built into the progressive income tax and payroll tax system (which thus contributes to the oversight problem that allowed Fannie and Freddie to happen) - and that the logical conclusion is that complete tax reform has the opportunity to maximize stimulus.
Eliminate the capital gains tax? Of course. But why not eliminate all current federal taxes?
Let's examine the FairTax proposition. The best thing to do is to read the books. While you're waiting for your books to come in (if you only get one book, get the second one), let's talk about the initial concept to grasp when contemplating this idea.
Here it is:
Everything you buy today (we're talking as a consumer) has the cost of the tax code - the income tax, the payroll tax, and the cost of tax compliance for the organization (and all of the individuals) that you are making the purchase from - as well as all of the taxes from the entire supply chain that the organization you are buying from does business with - embedded in the price of the goods or services your are buying.
I believe that this is the key initial concept to grasp before diving in to the details of the proposed FairTax legislation.
Let's take an example: loaf of bread.
You go to the grocery store and buy bread. You pay, let's say, $2.00 for that loaf of bread. The retailer charges you that price which includes the cost of the loaf of bread from their supplier as well as all of the tax costs - payroll, income, and profitability for that retailer. At the risk of a bit more detail: A bakery company manufactured that bread. For that bakery company to stay around, they have to charge enough for that loaf of bread to make a profit and pay the taxes on that profit. (Some of the left over profit over the long term has to go into new ovens, perhaps other bakery plants and other capital requirements.) Part of what you pay covers the payroll taxes - both employee and employer contributed for the people that work at the bakery company. Part of what you pay covers the income taxes for the people that work at the bakery company. Part of what you pay covers the cost of tax compliance that the bakery company has to spend to meet the regulations - tens of thousands of pages of tax code that has been changed tens of thousands of times in the last twenty years - that cover the company's tax obligations. Additionally, the bakery purchases flour as a key component of the loaf of bread. The bakery bears the costs of the same embedded taxes in the price it pays for flour to the mill, which pays the cost of the embedded taxes in the prices that it pays for the grain to the grower. Additionally raw materials like oil, baking equipment, cleaning chemicals, etc, etc all have the same characteristic tax burden built in to the price paid along the supply chain.
Brilliant economists have studied all of this and conclude that when you buy a loaf of bread for $2.00 right now you are paying about $0.50 in embedded federal taxes. If you find yourself not grasping this or disbelieving this, please go back and read the above over again.
In as simple terms as I can put it, the FairTax legislation proposes this: Eliminate the IRS, repeal the progressive income tax, the payroll tax, the capital gains tax, the death tax - all federal taxes and replace them with a consumption tax that's embedded into the price you pay at retail (managed by existing mechanisms that exist for the collection of sales taxes) with a federal tax revenue neutral result. In addition, include a socially conscious aspect that fairly excludes the purchase of staples to the poverty level so that anyone of any political disposition can support the legislation.
But before we proceed to discuss what the ultimate results are for adopting such a plan - and in our collective current economic state perhaps offer the only real opportunity to shrug off the current malaise - make sure that you completely understand the facts about the facts of the embedded costs that you are already paying - i.e. see above.
Most any confusion that you will experience in contemplating the FairTax legislation that is before the House and Senate will be a result of not keeping at the forefront of your thinking the existing embedded tax that you already pay. (Have I stressed this enough?)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference: A FairTax Primer: Part 1:
Uh, sorry, but you are completely off base about the "embedded taxes."
The concept of embedded taxes was developed by Harvard economics professor Dale Jorgenson. He did, in fact, conclude that approximately 22% of the cost of manufacturing goods in the US could be allocated to a federal tax component. Thus, the FairTax advocates -- particularly Boortz and Linder -- jumped on this and started saying that prices would drop by 22% as soon as the federal income tax was eliminated. And, since we would keep 100% of our paychecks, this would amount to "virtual raises" for all of us. This is exactly what they said in the hard-back edition of the FairTax book.
Jorgenson then called them and explained that they they were misrepresenting his work. Most of the so-called "embedded taxes" are taxes employees pay from their salaries. In order for these "embedded taxes" to disappear from the price of goods and services, then our salaries would need to be reduced by the amount we currently pay in taxes.
Or, to put it another way, assume you currently make $100,000 per year. Your employer has to cover that $100,000 in the price of goods and servies it sells in order to make a profit. Let's assume you pay $30,000 in taxes out of your salary. That $30,000 becomes part of the "embedded taxes".
Now, under the FairTax, your income and payroll tax obligations go away, but if your employer continues paying you $100,000 per year, the employer can't reduce prices because it still needs to cover your $100,000 salary. The only way your employer can reduce it's prices is if it reduces your salary by $30,000, i.e., the taxes you USED to pay under ouor current tax system.
Thus, your salary would drop to $70,000 per year. The employer could redue prices by 30%, but since the FairTax would be 30%, it would immediately raise prices back up to where they were.
Since Jorgenson (who, by the way, does NOT support the FairTax) apparently threatened to publicly admonish Boortz and Linder for misrepresenting his work, they very subtly changed the wording of the paper-back edition of the FairTax Book to reflect this, and clarified it even more in their subsequent book. (However, when they give speeches, they still claim that "you'll keep 100% of your paycheck" and prices will go down, so.)
Now, nobody who's actually studied the FairTax believes that Americans will accept an immediate 30% reduction in their wages, so virtuall all economists assume that wages and salaries will stay the same, which means the "embedded taxes" won't go away. Thus, prices will NOT drop under the FairTax and, in fact, will rise by the full tax-exclusve FairTax rate. (Which the FairTax folks claim is 30%, but everyone else who's looked at it believes it would be 50%-60%).
Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
Posted by: Truth Detector at Oct 1, 2008 8:10:48 AM
Uh, Truthy, so are you just hoping that you or your firm will get hired by the RE industry? Or do you just take it on yourself to troll little sites like this instead of actually building your own site? I like that construction sign!
Please stay tuned. Your tired old criticisms will be answered. See where it says 'Part 1' above? That means there's going to be more.
'Course we don't expect you to stay around. You dropped your little truth to power demiurge and are Googling away for the next great opportunity...
Posted by: MC at Oct 1, 2008 4:08:15 PM
James Pell - Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class - American hero with stories to tell about Iraq, Kosovo, and Bosnia.
Emcee - "Don't encourage him!" Jeff Goldstein
At the same trough...
Thomas More Law Center goes after DHS...
Issaquah, Washington Tea Party!
If you can't send a real tea bag...
What does it mean when every world event is a "distraction"?
Everything Old is New Again...
So you've heard of Chinese censorship of blogs right?
Concerned about Republican Leadership?
New currency anyone?
So it has come to this...
The Market Greets its Savior...
Art, ok maybe that's too strong a word
Election Night 2004 - Eye on C-BS
It feels so wrong so it's gotta be Wright
Super Bowl XL
The Armadillo Conceptual Series
The Revelation of Jesus Christ
UN Oil For Food - Oil For Fraud
WA Governor's Race
War on Terror
Wisconsin Vote Fraud
The most brilliant journalist of our age - does heavy lifting
Want to know what is really going on in our armed services? Matt does tell. He's a man of honor and gives tribute to men and women who serve all of us around the world.
Blogs For Terri
Terri Schindler Schiavo - We will NEVER forget!
Master photographer Jan shows off spectacular photos around the Pacific Northwest.
Commissioner Hugh Hewitt
The man! Inspirer of blogs, flogger of the currently most important.
Common Sense and Wonder
Great group blog - full of common sense penned by very talented people. I wonder...
Cream of the Crock
Diana once killed me in a place of wisdom. We've made up. One of my favorite experts.
Day by Day
Chris Muir provides the best first place for you to spew your coffee every morning
Digital Brown Pajamas
Sleepy Stormtroopers of the Religious Right. Plus Jeff is just a great guy. And Steve! Don't forget Steve! Oh no, where'd you guys go?
What can I say? I like Joe.
File it under...
These guys are animals. I mean it, they are animals.
The Federalist Papers are still alive - and so is Alexander ...
Hilarious answer to Arianna Huffington's psuedo-blog
In DC Journal
Bill is positively InDC, occasionally InDCent, always Bill
Lead by Robert Spencer - dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology plays in the modern world.
Find her on the radio and listen - does heavy lifting
Culture and current affairs from Seattle journalist and musician - and contributor to Sound Politics and Redstate - all in one very productive guy.
Conservative goddess - does heavy lifting
MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
Beth has a terrific blog AND she's my favorite Bama fan. (Which for an AU guy is like we've overcome class warfare, you know?)
Nerf Coated World
Friend Matt's wisdom tech and politech
Ninme, tenme, elevenme, just don't two-time me
Replacing the creator of worlds - do you miss Allah? Go see Attila.
I'm a Pixie. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. (It's Shell - Look what God made!) - Found her again!
The triumvirate. I'm not worthy! I'm not worthy!
Jeff's menagerie of extreme thoughts, well said.
Gail can write! And make you do your English homework!
'Wiley' Willis cats and thoughts.
Like Special K - only better
Shark and friends dig out the unsound
Tapscott's Copy Desk
Mark Tapscott, Director of The Heritage Foundation's Center for Media and Public Policy. Solid good read all the time. Moved to Examiner now...
The incomparable Ace of Spades HQ
The truth in spades!
The Jawa Report
Dr. Rusty and pals. Find original fisking and research here.
The Mighty Beldar
Crusty trial lawyer, bemused observer of politics & internet dilettante from Houston, Texas
the pragmatic chef™
Scott is a connoisseur of food and life! He really knows what seared means...
The Radio Equalizer -Brian Maloney
Could Brian be the next conservative heavy lifter? My money's on him.
The Truth Laid Bear
TTLB Ecosystem host and esteemed pundit.
Brilliant analysis - plus Red State WA!
Great conservative commentary and about some kind of Weblog awards or something like that
Fellow traveler McGehee's musings